Check if at least 1 element is contained in an array

[undefined]

Dear all,

I have 2 arrays :

• Array 1 : [element1, element 2, element 3, element 4]
• Array 2 : [element2, element 4]

I want to check if at least 1 element of Array 2 is contained in Array 1.
In this case, element2 of Array 2 exists in Array 1, so it should return true.

I know that I need to loop but I don’t know how I could use array aggregator combined with a filter, and so on.

Could you please help me on this issue ?

Thank you,

[Benjamin_from_Make]

Hello @undefined! Welcome!!

For this, you have to use an Iterator. For example, you iterate on Array 2, and in the next filter, you use the contains function with Array 1 as first parameter, and the “value” from the Iterator as second parameter. If this function returns “true”, it means it’s in Array 1

After this test, what do you want to do? Do you want to Aggregate Array 2 again, but with only the values that matched Array 1? Or anything else.

If you need some screenshots, let me know, I will build an example.

Kind regards

Benjamin

[Benjamin_from_Make]

Salut!

Try to change the filter to a “Array Operators / Contains”

The one you chose is for Strings.

Benjamin

[undefined]

Thank you, but it still says that 208.code is empty, although it’s not empty at all…

Thank you

[Benjamin_from_Make]

The output of your iterator doesn’t seem to match what you showed in the previous screenshot (where you Split the string).

Can you provide me with a global screenshot of the part in the scenario, as well as the configuration of the steps and screenshots? Or, send me the blueprint of your scenario.

Benjamin

[Benjamin_from_Make]

Thanks!!

It’s weird, I think there is an issue with the log display. I also see “empty”, but it worked in my case.

You see it shows “Empty”, but it compared true

I adapted a bit the scenario since I don’t have access to Quable, let me show you my config

From my example, I get only 1 matched item from Quable.

Can you try and test with a value you are sure you get from the Quable webhook and change attributs_pour_FT accordingly and see if you get an array element in the last step?

I think your scenario works

[undefined]

You are right, from the beginning it was working but the “empty” display wasn’t.
Topic solved, thank you!

[Benjamin_from_Make]

Great it works now! Don’t forget to always select the correct Filter type according to the Data type you compare.

Kind regards,

Benjamin

[Benjamin_from_Make]

Hello,

Just a little note for you and all community members. The “Empty” logs in the filters is a known issue; Make product management is on it to fix it

And, it doesn’t affect the execution of the Filters, it’s only a display issue.

Benjamin