Hi! For the past few days, I’ve been having a problem with my scenario, which takes topics from Google Sheets, creates an article (trying both GEMINI and OPEN AI — it also takes guidelines from Google Sheets), creates an image, runs it through Tinify, and publishes it on WordPress — first the image, then the content. And when publishing to WP, an error appears: “Missing value of required parameter ‘content’.”
And indeed - when I tested both OPEN AI and GEMINI, the result is EMPTY.
And the best part is that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t. The same scenario worked flawlessly before.
Do you have any idea what it could be?
Hi @Justyna1,
thank you for the explanation and also for the screenshot!
Would you be able to show me what’s inside the output “Candidates”? If you open up everything in the output, that would be very helpful, thank you!
Best,
Richard
Yeah that’s okay but indeed really weird as it shows that no output was generated.
Sorry to ask even more but by seeing this I don’t know what’s wrong…
What is your input? Basically open up everything in the upper part of your screenshot (messages, generation configurations, system instructions…
This is my input. Below “text” is really long prompt:
You are a leading expert in home appliances in Poland, specializing in vacuum cleaners and smart home solutions. Your knowledge is current, in-depth, and based on practical testing, not just manufacturer data.
Your task is to write a comprehensive expert article on the topic: How to store an upright vacuum cleaner? A review of hangers, standing stations, and clever storage solutions.
The article must be approximately 2,000 words long and absolutely substantive, aimed at readers seeking specific, reliable information before making a purchasing decision.
Your content must include:
Analysis of current trends: Discuss the latest technologies and developments in the segment covered by the topic (e.g., all-in-one stations, AI navigation, filters, ecology, suction power).
Specific Model Examples: List and briefly describe at least 5-7 specific (unless the title specifies otherwise) popular vacuum cleaner models on the Polish market that illustrate the topics discussed.
Approximate Pricing and Segmentation: For each model listed, provide an approximate price range (e.g., PLN 1,500-2,000) and indicate the segment (budget, mid-range, premium) it falls into.
Practical Comparisons: Use lists to clearly compare the features, specifications, advantages, and disadvantages of the solutions or products discussed.
Strictly adhere to the following formatting and style rules:
HTML Structure: Separate main sections with tags, and subsections with tags. Bold key terms or phrases with . Use and tags for enumerations and lists.
Capitalization in Headings: In and headings, capitalize only the first letter of the word (and proper names, e.g., Dyson, Roborock, HEPA).
Direct Beginning: Start your article directly with an introduction (no headline). Don’t use any introductory phrases like “This article is for you” or “I’ll definitely help.”
No Title in Content: Don’t include the article title within the generated content.
No Dividers or Emoji: Don’t use any visual separators (e.g., “—”) between paragraphs or any emoji.
Avoid Clichés: Avoid trivial and common phrases like “These days…”, “There are many models available on the market…”, “In summary…”, “It’s worth noting…”, or “Key Takeaways.” Get straight to the point.
The prompt looks like:
Role and Goal ###
You are an expert in {role} and an experienced copywriter who creates engaging and credible content. Your task is to write a comprehensive article on {{9.1}}, optimized for both search engines (SEO) and Google Discover algorithms. The text must be substantive, trustworthy, and written in a way that arouses curiosity. Create the content immediately; do not include the title in the content, keep all your thoughts and analyses to yourself, and serve me the finished text.
Audience ###
• *Target audience: {audience}
• *Level of advancement: {Level of advancement}
• *Primary need/problem: {keyword}
• *Reader’s goal: To learn the answer to question {title}.
Key SEO Elements ###
• *Primary Keyword: {keyword}
• *Secondary Keywords / LSI: Try to choose these yourself.
• Search Intent: Informational (users are looking for comprehensive knowledge and answers to questions).
Key Google Discover Elements ###
• E-E-A-T Pillar (Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust):
○ Author: The article should be written from the perspective of {{9.9}}. If possible, mention the author’s specific experiences (“As someone who works with plants, I often meet seniors who…”).
○ Sources: Cite 1-2 scientific studies, official reports, statistics, and provide the expert’s name and title.
○ Credibility: Avoid absolute statements (“always,” “never”). Use phrases like “usually,” “in many cases,” and “research suggests.”
• Click-Worthy Headline (attention-grabbing, but not clickbait): Use three Discover-optimized headlines in your text. They must spark curiosity, ask an intriguing question, or address a common problem.
- Example 1 (Question): Does the probiotic you’re taking really work? Here’s how to find out.
- Example 2 (Controversy): 5 Mistakes When Choosing a Probiotic That Almost Everyone Makes.
- Example 3 (Benefit): This One Ingredient in a Probiotic Can Revolutionize Your Gut Health. • Emotional Trigger/Hook: The main hook of the article is {keyword}
Article Structure ###
- Introduction (Lead):
- Don’t use a headline here.
- Start with a hook.
- In 2-3 sentences, present the reader’s main problem and promise a specific, valuable solution later in the text.
- Body (Body of the Article):
- Use short paragraphs (maximum 3-4 sentences).
- Use numerous subheadings (H2, H3) containing keywords. And use and , not ## and ###. Don’t use — between paragraphs.
- Use bulleted and numbered lists to make the text easier to scan.
- Bold the most important concepts and conclusions.
- Don’t add emoji.
- Don’t use ** in bullet points; use instead.
- Summary:
- Summarize key information in 2-3 sentences.
- Conclude with a clear, practical conclusion or advice for the reader. Avoid generalities.
- [Optional: Add a subtle call to action (CTA), e.g., ‘Share your experience with probiotics in the comments!’ or ‘Also check out our other article about…’].
Style and Tone ###
• *Tone: {{9.11}}.
• Language: Simple, understandable to a layperson. Avoid complicated industry jargon or explain it in simple terms. Write proactively, addressing the reader directly (“Consider…”, “Remember that…”).
Restrictions and Guidelines ###
• *Length: {{9.12}}
• Uniqueness: Text must be 100% unique and cannot be a copy of existing content.
• Facts: All data, statistics, and scientific claims must be verified and come from reliable sources.
No emojis!
That is really weird. Did it happen once or is on every run that the output is empty?
I just put your prompt into it and I receive results 
I don’t understand.
It sometimes works and sometimes doesn’t.
I even created a new account on make.com and manually recreated the same scenario. Same situation—sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t.
That is indeed weird
What I’d do in this case is use the Make DevTool and look into the response body. And then try to figure out why Gemini sometimes doesn’t respond. Sounds really odd to me though.
Have you tried the exact same prompt multiple times? Maybe something in the prompt is off?
Yest, I did saw this post and I’ve checked it.
I change the language model to a lower one and now - it works.
3 Likes
Hi everyone,
I just wanted to let you know that this appears to be linked to a known issue on Google’s side. You can find more details and follow the discussion here:
2 Likes