This looks like a good white-label or overflow partner fit, especially where the work needs more than app-to-app Make scenarios.
TinyOps Studio is strongest on the messy implementation layer: CRM and lead routing, webhook/API integrations, Sheets/Airtable data contracts, error handling, retries, idempotency notes, run logs, and client-safe handoff docs. I would start with one representative client workflow so the acceptance criteria, communication rhythm, and handoff style are clear before either side commits to ongoing volume.
A practical first step would be a paid 6-10 hour pilot or fixed milestone around one sanitized client workflow. Send one sample payload or current scenario outline, the target CRM/marketing stack, and the success criteria, and I can map the first milestone and timeline.
Hi Josh,
This is a strong fit. I build AI-assisted automation systems around APIs, webhooks, CRM/marketing ops, lead routing, and operational handoff docs. The part of your post that stood out is owning solutions, not just executing tickets - that is exactly how I prefer to work.
For a first paid slice, I would be comfortable owning one CRM / lead-attribution workflow end to end:
- map trigger, input, output, and failure states
- build the Make scenario with API/webhook boundaries
- add retries, logging, and does-not-silently-fail checks
- document the handoff so your team or client can maintain it
I have also sketched a Make-first state-machine blueprint for exactly this style of work: webhook/event intake → durable status → idempotency key → retry/recovery note → operator-visible handoff. I can adapt that into a client-specific v1 instead of starting from a blank scenario.
Public proof:
I am available async-first and can start with a bounded 24-72 hour paid test before discussing ongoing bench work.
Best,
Joseph